4,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 128:
Line 128: − +
→When even Creationist sites disagree...: fixing link to Outer space
:::::::: JakeC, push [[evolution]] somewhere else. Hoyle was the greatest [[British]] scientist of the 20th century, and unless you have something factual to say about his findings, do something else productive.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:32, 2 January 2008 (EST)
:::::::: JakeC, push [[evolution]] somewhere else. Hoyle was the greatest [[British]] scientist of the 20th century, and unless you have something factual to say about his findings, do something else productive.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:32, 2 January 2008 (EST)
::::::::::::One should perhaps approach Hoyle with some caution. He promoted the [[theory]] that life evolved in [[space]], spreading through the universe via panspermia, and that [[evolution]] on earth is driven by a steady influx of [[virus]]es arriving via [[comet]]s. We all know that [[extraterrestrial life]] is one of many [[Liberal Myths]]. [[User:WKirkwood|WKirkwood]] 21:49, 2 January 2008 (EST)
::::::::::::One should perhaps approach Hoyle with some caution. He promoted the [[theory]] that life evolved in [[Outer space|space]], spreading through the universe via panspermia, and that [[evolution]] on earth is driven by a steady influx of [[virus]]es arriving via [[comet]]s. We all know that [[extraterrestrial life]] is one of many [[Liberal Myths]]. [[User:WKirkwood|WKirkwood]] 21:49, 2 January 2008 (EST)
Something factual? The [[Answers in Genesis]] [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2/4254news3-24-2000.asp article] on this issue outlines several reasons why Hoyle's his conclusion was incorrect; the [http://www.csm.org.uk/news.php?viewmessage=10 Creation Science Movement ] agrees as well. I can continue looking for more factual information if you'd like. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 22:01, 2 January 2008 (EST)
Something factual? The [[Answers in Genesis]] [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2/4254news3-24-2000.asp article] on this issue outlines several reasons why Hoyle's his conclusion was incorrect; the [http://www.csm.org.uk/news.php?viewmessage=10 Creation Science Movement ] agrees as well. I can continue looking for more factual information if you'd like. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 22:01, 2 January 2008 (EST)