Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
12 bytes added ,  17:19, June 30, 2008
m
links
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''Richard Lenski''' is a professor of microbial [[ecology]] at Michigan State University.  He holds a doctorate from the [[University of North Carolina]] and a B.A. from Oberlin College. He has received numerous prestigious awards during his career including: National Science Foundation's Presidential Young Investigator Award(1988), a John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Fellowship (1996), and twice received the American Society of Naturalists President's Award for Best Paper in The American Naturalist (1986 & 1992). He was elected into the US National Academy of Science in 2006.<ref>https://www.msu.edu/~lenski/</ref>  
+
'''Richard Lenski''' is a [[professor]] of microbial [[ecology]] at Michigan State University.  He holds a [[doctorate]] from the [[University of North Carolina]] and a B.A. from Oberlin College. He has received numerous prestigious awards during his career including: National Science Foundation's Presidential Young Investigator Award(1988), a John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Fellowship (1996), and twice received the American Society of Naturalists President's Award for Best Paper in The American Naturalist (1986 & 1992). He was elected into the US National Academy of Science in 2006.<ref>https://www.msu.edu/~lenski/</ref>  
    
Lenski is best known for his claim to have observed [[evolution]] of [[E. coli]] in a long-term laboratory study, insisting that it was not due to contamination.  His 2008 paper asserting his claims was [[peer review]]ed in a mere 14 days, sparking questions from the [[user:Aschlafly|owner]] of this site<ref>See [[Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog]].</ref> about the thoroughness of the review.
 
Lenski is best known for his claim to have observed [[evolution]] of [[E. coli]] in a long-term laboratory study, insisting that it was not due to contamination.  His 2008 paper asserting his claims was [[peer review]]ed in a mere 14 days, sparking questions from the [[user:Aschlafly|owner]] of this site<ref>See [[Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog]].</ref> about the thoroughness of the review.
Line 5: Line 5:  
When challenged, Lenski thrice referred to the challenges as [[slander]], yet has filed no lawsuit charging that (or [[libel]]). [[Truth]] offers total legal protection from accusations of libel.
 
When challenged, Lenski thrice referred to the challenges as [[slander]], yet has filed no lawsuit charging that (or [[libel]]). [[Truth]] offers total legal protection from accusations of libel.
   −
When Lenski received a public request for the data underlying for his published claims, he did not provide the actual data even though his study was taxpayer-funded.   
+
When Lenski received a public request for the [[data]] underlying for his published claims, he did not provide the actual data even though his study was taxpayer-funded.   
    
Undisclosed data from the central claims in Lenski's 2008 paper are noted below (pp. 2-3 from paper, superscripts omitted):  
 
Undisclosed data from the central claims in Lenski's 2008 paper are noted below (pp. 2-3 from paper, superscripts omitted):  
444

edits

Navigation menu