4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + +
Debate:Can conservapedia become the next Wikipedia, is this good or bad (view source)
Revision as of 18:20, June 30, 2008
, 18:20, June 30, 2008no edit summary
{{debate}}
{{debate}}
It can, simply because Wikipedia is the root of everything ban that happens in the world, kind of like homosexuals to Fred Phelps. But wait, you're probably thinking something like "You're just a crazy troll come here to deface the good name of Conservapedia," you're right in some regards, but wrong in saying CP has a good name. Now back to my original point. To understand what I'm talking about, we must look at the root of the word Wikipedia. It is a very little known fact that the word "Wiki" comes from an ancient Scandanavian root, "Wiikie" which means "Nudity." This may seem strange to some people, but it makes sense when I tell you Wikipedia was originally meant to be a pr0n site. So it's quite obvious now why CP is superior.
What is needed is something different than each. Something that is actually unbiased. CP is certainly biased, so is wikipedia, the difference is that on wikipedia the bias is pretty much accidental; people edit wikipedia from all over the world, people of every conceivable religion, certainly liberal beliefs would come from such a diverse background. Most people haven't even heard of CP on the other hand, and it's unlikely that many people that aren't passionately conservative would bother with the site. Certainly the American flag is not going do draw many people from the rest of the world. Most of the articles that have any real content are from the domain of religion/politics, and this obviously is going to create a huge bias in CP. You would be missing knowledge from more than half of the American population, and that isn't good either.-gendoikari4
What is needed is something different than each. Something that is actually unbiased. CP is certainly biased, so is wikipedia, the difference is that on wikipedia the bias is pretty much accidental; people edit wikipedia from all over the world, people of every conceivable religion, certainly liberal beliefs would come from such a diverse background. Most people haven't even heard of CP on the other hand, and it's unlikely that many people that aren't passionately conservative would bother with the site. Certainly the American flag is not going do draw many people from the rest of the world. Most of the articles that have any real content are from the domain of religion/politics, and this obviously is going to create a huge bias in CP. You would be missing knowledge from more than half of the American population, and that isn't good either.-gendoikari4