3,303
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
User talk:ConcernedModerate (view source)
Revision as of 18:32, June 30, 2008
, 18:32, June 30, 2008no edit summary
To answer your question, my primary concern is with the unneccesary ideological prefaces to at least one news headline I find every time I log on to this site. Conservapedia presents an interesting alternative Wikipedia, but it can never hope to gain Wikipedia's scope and range of support if blatant conservative bias remains evident in the main page news column. Given the time I can devote to the site, doing my part to mend that serious ill is, in my opinion, a substantive contribution. [[User:ConcernedModerate|ConcernedModerate]] 12:48, 30 June 2008
To answer your question, my primary concern is with the unneccesary ideological prefaces to at least one news headline I find every time I log on to this site. Conservapedia presents an interesting alternative Wikipedia, but it can never hope to gain Wikipedia's scope and range of support if blatant conservative bias remains evident in the main page news column. Given the time I can devote to the site, doing my part to mend that serious ill is, in my opinion, a substantive contribution. [[User:ConcernedModerate|ConcernedModerate]] 12:48, 30 June 2008
Conservapedia naturally presents a conservative point of view and world outlook. We believe this to be justifiable and hold the 'NPOV' flaunted by Wikipedia to be a flag of convenience for [[Liberal]] and subversive indoctrination. While we welcome constructive edits from you, I fear that your remarks about our news column and your statement of intent means that your stay here may be a short one. Please think again. Best wishes, [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 14:32, 30 June 2008 (EDT)