Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:  
Although superficially similar to [[Intelligent Design]], Intelligent Design proponents have made clear that they are not the same thing, and in fact [[William Dembski]] has gone so far as to say that "As far as design theorists are concerned, theistic evolution is American evangelicalism's ill-conceived accommodation to Darwinism."<ref>''What every theologian should know about creation, evolution, and design'' Center for Interdisciplinary Studies Transactions 3(2), William Demsbki</ref>
 
Although superficially similar to [[Intelligent Design]], Intelligent Design proponents have made clear that they are not the same thing, and in fact [[William Dembski]] has gone so far as to say that "As far as design theorists are concerned, theistic evolution is American evangelicalism's ill-conceived accommodation to Darwinism."<ref>''What every theologian should know about creation, evolution, and design'' Center for Interdisciplinary Studies Transactions 3(2), William Demsbki</ref>
   −
The primary difference is the percieved role of proof. While most theistic evolutionists are content to accept God on faith alone, Intelligent Design seeks to prove the necessary existence of a designer in the creation of life by scientific means.
+
The primary difference is the percieved role of [[proof]]. While most theistic evolutionists are content to accept God on faith alone, Intelligent Design seeks to prove the necessary existence of a designer in the creation of life by scientific means.
    
==Theistic evolution and Progressive Creationism ==
 
==Theistic evolution and Progressive Creationism ==
87

edits

Navigation menu