185
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 35:
Line 35: − + − A Lenski defender says: From the first page of the paper in question (Blount, Z. D., C. Z. Borland, and R. E. Lenski. 2008. Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli. PNAS, USA 105:7899-7906):
→Study Omissions
</TD><TD width=50% valign=top>
</TD><TD width=50% valign=top>
DATA ON SPECIFIC CONCENTRATIONS USED?<br>
DATA ON SPECIFIC CONCENTRATIONS USED?<br>
From the first page of the paper in question (Blount, Z. D., C. Z. Borland, and R. E. Lenski. 2008. Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli. PNAS, USA 105:7899-7906):
<br>"To
<br>"To
address the repeatability of evolutionary trajectories and outcomes,
address the repeatability of evolutionary trajectories and outcomes,