Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 43:
Line 43: − +
→Contaminants???: link to his second response
A Lenski defender says, "If interested in a thorough review, contact the group directly, with a legitimate request for data. Otherwise, the disclaimer is a more than adequate description of the sample handling process."
A Lenski defender says, "If interested in a thorough review, contact the group directly, with a legitimate request for data. Otherwise, the disclaimer is a more than adequate description of the sample handling process."
IN FACT, TWO REQUESTS WERE MADE DIRECTLY TO LENSKI FOR DATA, WITHOUT SUCCESS. HIS SECOND RESPONSE WAS RUDE AND INSULTING.
IN FACT, TWO REQUESTS WERE MADE DIRECTLY TO LENSKI FOR DATA, WITHOUT SUCCESS. HIS [[Conservapedia:Lenski_dialog#Second_reply|SECOND RESPONSE]] WAS RUDE AND INSULTING.
</TD></TR></table>
</TD></TR></table>