'''Issue 1: GA status of Wikipedia's Conservapedia article
'''Issue 1: GA status of Wikipedia's Conservapedia article
−
I would not have nominated this article to be listed as a good article. You were correct that the new cite on that statement did not 'explicitly' state that Conservapedia contains factual errors. I have since revised the statement to more closely reflect what the article does say, which is still harshly critical of Conservapedia.
+
I would not have nominated this article to be listed as a good article. You were correct that the new cite on that statement did not ''explicitly'' state that Conservapedia contains factual errors. I have since revised the statement to more closely reflect what the article does say, which is still harshly critical of Conservapedia.