300
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + + + +
no edit summary
::: Very well put. It took only 2-3 minutes to find a citation for the second example and Jimmy could have done likewise, rather than try to use a fact tag to make a (misguided) ideological point.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:00, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
::: Very well put. It took only 2-3 minutes to find a citation for the second example and Jimmy could have done likewise, rather than try to use a fact tag to make a (misguided) ideological point.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:00, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
::::True: If you are so certain that the references for the multitude of claims that are made in the second example are true, then way don't you actually provide them since you are the one making the claims? I don't have the time to do research for others, especially research for alleged facts that I think are of a dubious nature. I have enough time trying to reference the claims I make in my own article edits only to have them deleted because they are liberal fluff.
::::Mr. Schlafly: Your assertion about Wikipedia's entry on Newton is utterly false. It is located here. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton%27s_religious_views] All you have to do is click on the link in the main article titled "Isaac Newton's religious views". Could this reference please be dropped for the sake of accuracy? --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 21:13, 1 July 2008 (EDT)