277
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: + +
Debate:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles? (view source)
Revision as of 15:44, July 4, 2008
, 15:44, July 4, 2008→Yes
i really have to agree to the person ahead of me it IS called conservapedia, if i made a website called www.super-man-is-awesome.com then it would be ok to be a little biased, but the bias is still quite annoying-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 00:26, 16 May 2008 (EDT)
i really have to agree to the person ahead of me it IS called conservapedia, if i made a website called www.super-man-is-awesome.com then it would be ok to be a little biased, but the bias is still quite annoying-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 00:26, 16 May 2008 (EDT)
What makes Conservapedia attractive to so many people is the fact that there are biased articles there. Biased with the truth and liberally bathed in facts and actual reality. All traditional conservative ideals. This may clash with those who think truth is relative to how facts and data are perceived through an individuals political filter. Conservatives require nor want such filters.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:44, 4 July 2008 (EDT)
==It's a meaningless question==
==It's a meaningless question==