37
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 44:
Line 44: + +
Talk:Arguments for the existence of God (view source)
Revision as of 00:38, July 5, 2008
, 00:38, July 5, 2008→Aristotle: just noticed this
::Also, a note: Of course St. Thomas and many others have used the Cosmological Argument to demonstrate the existence of God. But those authors are fully aware that the Cosmological Argument by itself is not sufficient to prove that the First Cause is the Christian God. There's a lot more work to be done. That's all my edit is saying. [[User:NosnhoJE|NosnhoJE]] 20:36, 4 July 2008 (EDT)
::Also, a note: Of course St. Thomas and many others have used the Cosmological Argument to demonstrate the existence of God. But those authors are fully aware that the Cosmological Argument by itself is not sufficient to prove that the First Cause is the Christian God. There's a lot more work to be done. That's all my edit is saying. [[User:NosnhoJE|NosnhoJE]] 20:36, 4 July 2008 (EDT)
: Finally, what do you mean by "an infinite chain of events disagrees with science"? If you're going to go to the Big Bang, remember that all science says is that scientific inquiry can't look farther back than that. [[User:NosnhoJE|NosnhoJE]] 20:38, 4 July 2008 (EDT)