Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
401 bytes added ,  20:14, July 5, 2008
m
Agreeing with suggestion of previous contributor, disagreeing with another.
Line 74: Line 74:  
==To much emphasis on abortion==
 
==To much emphasis on abortion==
 
I think that this artical is focused mainly on abortion which is not it is for.
 
I think that this artical is focused mainly on abortion which is not it is for.
 +
 +
::Agreed. I suggest cutting out all abortion references except one: Give it a bullet point in the list of goals, and no more. - [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]]
    
== Misandry ==
 
== Misandry ==
 
This article has clearly mistaken the definition of femanism for misandry. There are more even-minded, considerate, and heterosexual feminists that can be counted, where as this article only lists those who qualify as man-haters. Honestly I think this kind of blatent bias is what's ruined Conservapedia, and really the entire country, but there's no reason to suggest that feminism goes against any of the values that we all share, and I suggest we completely overhall this entire article and include a section regarding feminist inspired misandry and the differences between the two practices. I also don't think there is any reason to suggest that feminism is a sin and in any way connected to homosexual behavior, which seems to be what this article implys. I'm not so quick to put females who wish to be heard in the same boat as abominations, and I wish I could say the same for all of the Conservapidia editors.
 
This article has clearly mistaken the definition of femanism for misandry. There are more even-minded, considerate, and heterosexual feminists that can be counted, where as this article only lists those who qualify as man-haters. Honestly I think this kind of blatent bias is what's ruined Conservapedia, and really the entire country, but there's no reason to suggest that feminism goes against any of the values that we all share, and I suggest we completely overhall this entire article and include a section regarding feminist inspired misandry and the differences between the two practices. I also don't think there is any reason to suggest that feminism is a sin and in any way connected to homosexual behavior, which seems to be what this article implys. I'm not so quick to put females who wish to be heard in the same boat as abominations, and I wish I could say the same for all of the Conservapidia editors.
 
--[[User:YoungConservative|YoungConservative]] 15:43, 2 February 2008 (EST)YoungConservative
 
--[[User:YoungConservative|YoungConservative]] 15:43, 2 February 2008 (EST)YoungConservative
 +
 +
:What you say was true, back when the feminists really were seeking legal equality - before the radical feminists hijacked it for their attacks on family life, hate of tradition, and abortionist agenda. - [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]]
    
== "boys being cheerleaders for it" ==
 
== "boys being cheerleaders for it" ==
201

edits

Navigation menu