277
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Debate:The Declaration of Independence or Interdependence? (view source)
Revision as of 16:44, July 8, 2008
, 16:44, July 8, 2008→Your Declaration
:The difference being that one is the antithesis of the other. So that you can't claim to be both. If you do though you are more likely ascribing to the one over the other. Which is one of the points of this debate. The difference being the Declaration of Independence is one of the founding documents of the USA along with the Constitution and Bill of Rights. It affirms inalienable rights to individuals and limits governmental powers. The Declaration of Interdependence doesn't affirm any inalienable rights nor does it limit the power of the state over the individual. In fact it only mentions the collective of humanity as if it were a single element of nature. It seems to have more of a concern about humanities impact on nature and the ecological integrity of the Earth. In contrast with the Declaration of Independence it mandates the totalitarian role of government to control and regulate everything. Its language is that of collectivism and whose goal is nothing short of a worldwide socialist order. All packaged in warm and fuzzy, touchy feely wording meant to hide its despicable goals with fluffy doublespeak.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 15:33, 4 July 2008 (EDT)
:The difference being that one is the antithesis of the other. So that you can't claim to be both. If you do though you are more likely ascribing to the one over the other. Which is one of the points of this debate. The difference being the Declaration of Independence is one of the founding documents of the USA along with the Constitution and Bill of Rights. It affirms inalienable rights to individuals and limits governmental powers. The Declaration of Interdependence doesn't affirm any inalienable rights nor does it limit the power of the state over the individual. In fact it only mentions the collective of humanity as if it were a single element of nature. It seems to have more of a concern about humanities impact on nature and the ecological integrity of the Earth. In contrast with the Declaration of Independence it mandates the totalitarian role of government to control and regulate everything. Its language is that of collectivism and whose goal is nothing short of a worldwide socialist order. All packaged in warm and fuzzy, touchy feely wording meant to hide its despicable goals with fluffy doublespeak.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 15:33, 4 July 2008 (EDT)
==Choosing wisely==
Then pledge your allegiance. Which one will you choose? To live independently and free from
oppression? Or do you prefer dependency on others to have authority over your decisions? To
worship at the altar of interdependency which is representative of the Earth Charter which
is housed in the Ark of Hope? The revered Charter is transported in the Ark of Hope, a
blasphemous mimicry of the Judeo-Christian Ark of the Covenant, which held the two tablets
containing the Ten Commandments that God gave to Moses. The counterfeit Ark of Hope is
actually designed to look like the Ark of the Covenant and its devotees carry it around with
worshipful solemnity. It is marked with occultic devices inside as well as outside so as to
leave no doubt to any observer of what it truly represents. Make your declaration of
independence today. Or declare your interdependency to your oppressive masters who have
already declared you as a willing servant to their will. Remaining silent will only define
your compliance with the latter.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 12:44, 8 July 2008 (EDT)