Changes

*"Not only are we going to New Hampshire ... we're going to South Carolina and Oklahoma and Arizona and North Dakota and New Mexico, and we're going to California and Texas and New York! And we're going to South Dakota and Oregon and Washington and Michigan. And then we're going to Washington, D.C. to take back the White House, Yeeeeeaaaaaargh!" --The notorious 'Dean Scream' from Howard's concession at the Iowa caucus.

*"Not only are we going to New Hampshire ... we're going to South Carolina and Oklahoma and Arizona and North Dakota and New Mexico, and we're going to California and Texas and New York! And we're going to South Dakota and Oregon and Washington and Michigan. And then we're going to Washington, D.C. to take back the White House, Yeeeeeaaaaaargh!" --The notorious 'Dean Scream' from Howard's concession at the Iowa caucus.

*CNN's Wolf Blitzer interviewed Howard Dean and asked should the [[Democrats]] who took money from Abramoff give that money to charity or give it back? Dean responds <ref>http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0601/08/le.01.html , CNN LATE EDITION WITH WOLF BLITZER, January 8, 2006</ref>"There are no Democrats who took money from Jack Abramoff, not one, not one single Democrat. Every person named in this scandal is a Republican. Every person under investigation is a Republican. Every person indicted is a Republican. This is a Republican finance scandal. There is no evidence that [[Jack Abramoff]] ever gave any Democrat any money. And we've looked through all of those [[FEC]] reports to make sure that's true." Two days prior, a report surfaced showing that Democrats had taken more than $1,541,672. from now imprisoned Abramoff. <ref>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1551786/posts , FreeRepublic.com List of Democrats who have taken Abramoff money, January 4, 2006</ref> Knowing the information Dean said was false, Blitzer questioned Dean again "...a bunch of Democrats did take money that presumably originated with Jack Abramoff." Dean "That's not true either"

*CNN's Wolf Blitzer interviewed Howard Dean and asked should the [[Democrats]] who took money from Abramoff give that money to charity or give it back? Dean responds <ref>http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0601/08/le.01.html , CNN LATE EDITION WITH WOLF BLITZER, January 8, 2006</ref>"There are no Democrats who took money from Jack Abramoff, not one, not one single Democrat. Every person named in this scandal is a Republican. Every person under investigation is a Republican. Every person indicted is a Republican. This is a Republican finance scandal. There is no evidence that [[Jack Abramoff]] ever gave any Democrat any money. And we've looked through all of those [[FEC]] reports to make sure that's true." Two days prior, a report surfaced showing that Democrats had taken more than $1,541,672. from now tribes associated with the imprisoned Abramoff. <ref>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1551786/posts , FreeRepublic.com List of Democrats who have taken Abramoff money, January 4, 2006</ref> Knowing the information Dean said was false, Blitzer questioned Dean again "...a bunch of Democrats did take money that presumably originated with Jack Abramoff." Dean "That's not true either." There is no clear evidence that the money from the groups was in exchange for favors for Jack Abramoff.

==2004 Presidential Elections==

==2004 Presidential Elections==