1,516
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: +
Debate:Should the U.S.A. abide by a withdrawal timetable if the Iraqi Parliament votes for one? (view source)
Revision as of 21:34, July 14, 2008
, 21:34, July 14, 2008→Yes
If the purpose of invading Iraq was to remove Saddam and set up a democratic society, then we MUST respect the will of the sovereign nation and remove our forces if asked to by the Iraqi government/parliament. --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 17:08, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
If the purpose of invading Iraq was to remove Saddam and set up a democratic society, then we MUST respect the will of the sovereign nation and remove our forces if asked to by the Iraqi government/parliament. --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 17:08, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
If we're recognizing that Iraq is now a sovereign nation under the government we helped establish, then we have to be consistent with that principle and respect any timetable they set. The door would still be open for us to increase a presence there by mutual agreement in the future, and we can use the assets in Afghanistan and at home, badly. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 17:34, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
== No ==
== No ==