4,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 42:
Line 42: + + + +
no edit summary
It looks like you actually create content whose sole purpose is not to disparage the opposing viewpoint and advance wildly insane versions of the conservative view. Why don't you stop deluding yourself and actually join a decent collaborative encyclopedia like Wikipedia. I mean, Conservapedia, trustworthy? The inherent bias in the name makes that assertion laughably ironic.[[User:FatVirgin|FatVirgin]] 20:13, 5 July 2008 (EDT)
It looks like you actually create content whose sole purpose is not to disparage the opposing viewpoint and advance wildly insane versions of the conservative view. Why don't you stop deluding yourself and actually join a decent collaborative encyclopedia like Wikipedia. I mean, Conservapedia, trustworthy? The inherent bias in the name makes that assertion laughably ironic.[[User:FatVirgin|FatVirgin]] 20:13, 5 July 2008 (EDT)
==Likely vandal==
Hi Henry. [[User:NNSTK17]] seems to be a vandal. Please look at his edit history. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:53, 14 July 2008 (EDT)