23
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 60:
Line 60: + +
Debate:Is Conservapedia a 'Trustworthy Encyclopedia'? (view source)
Revision as of 11:58, July 15, 2008
, 11:58, July 15, 2008→AGAINST
No, that's really interesting... Editors don't have to justify their statements. That's good, I mean it's only the process by which actual factual encyclopedia's are rigorously put through. Why should you do it here?///
No, that's really interesting... Editors don't have to justify their statements. That's good, I mean it's only the process by which actual factual encyclopedia's are rigorously put through. Why should you do it here?///
Depends on how you classify trustworthy. Obviously some materials are going to offend people who are more to a liberal side. Come on-it is biased-check the main page about Obama if you don't believe me.--[[User:Faizaguo|Faizaguo]] 07:58, 15 July 2008 (EDT)