28
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 134:
Line 134: + +
Talk:Flaws in Richard Lenski Study (view source)
Revision as of 17:59, July 16, 2008
, 17:59, July 16, 2008→Formal Response to PNAS
::::::::They could object because Conservapedia's criticisms are obviously false. If this page hasn't made that clear, I don't know what could.[[User:Gerlach|Gerlach]] 13:44, 16 July 2008 (EDT)
::::::::They could object because Conservapedia's criticisms are obviously false. If this page hasn't made that clear, I don't know what could.[[User:Gerlach|Gerlach]] 13:44, 16 July 2008 (EDT)
:::::::::They would have to prove that Conservapedia's criticisms are false, and they cannot do that. You sound like a Lenski supporter. You need to open your mind to the truth.--[[User:JBoley|JBoley]] 13:59, 16 July 2008 (EDT)
== Expertise in Statistics ==
== Expertise in Statistics ==