Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
sorry for the block
Line 24: Line 24:  
==References==
 
==References==
 
Sir/Ma'am:  Why is it "liberal distortion" to request references that are required by the commandments of this encyclopedia?  My citation request at the 'Liberal Creep' article was explicitly permitted by the guidelines so why does the request "make it seem untruthful"?  I'm sure that if the assertion is truthful, the person asserting such truthfulness would have no problem providing the reference thus ensuring Conservapedia remains a trustworthy source.  Wouldn't you agree?--[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 20:32, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 
Sir/Ma'am:  Why is it "liberal distortion" to request references that are required by the commandments of this encyclopedia?  My citation request at the 'Liberal Creep' article was explicitly permitted by the guidelines so why does the request "make it seem untruthful"?  I'm sure that if the assertion is truthful, the person asserting such truthfulness would have no problem providing the reference thus ensuring Conservapedia remains a trustworthy source.  Wouldn't you agree?--[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 20:32, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Unblock==
 +
 +
After discussion with another sysop, I've decided to unblock your account. He says I owe you an apology, too. Sorry! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:36, 16 July 2008 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu