Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
849 bytes added ,  02:34, July 17, 2008
Line 160: Line 160:     
::The statement was spun against him by Bush and many liberal pundits then and now. What you think about people who use racial slurs is misleading and inappropriate; you are suggesting that what he said was a slur directed at race, while he explicitly stated that it was not. Also, it is put forward without context or resolution, especially because he apologized and it is written in a PR format. Rather, it may help to identify the basis that it holds in the context of the 2000 election, ex: California was considered a swing state in the primaries, for instance.--[[User:CTrooper|CTrooper]] 22:27, 16 July 2008 (EDT)
 
::The statement was spun against him by Bush and many liberal pundits then and now. What you think about people who use racial slurs is misleading and inappropriate; you are suggesting that what he said was a slur directed at race, while he explicitly stated that it was not. Also, it is put forward without context or resolution, especially because he apologized and it is written in a PR format. Rather, it may help to identify the basis that it holds in the context of the 2000 election, ex: California was considered a swing state in the primaries, for instance.--[[User:CTrooper|CTrooper]] 22:27, 16 July 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::I think the use of a slur, however you want to deem it was directed, is important, and I attempted to put it within the time line you insist upon.  As far as my views on those who use slurs, how do you feel about them?  Do you condone the use of a slur word, even when the user has to go on to spin/explain that it wasn't directed at a race?  He even acknowledges that it's offensive, "in language that may offend some people."  If he's not afraid to use the term, then I think people should be aware of that fact.  Perhaps our ideas of what a dictionary is are different.  I believe it should be a fact-filled resource, and you'd prefer to put those aside and use laudatory statements instead.  Maybe we can compromise and just find a good section for the remarks, perhaps a Quotes section? --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 22:34, 16 July 2008 (EDT)
    
== Czechoslovakia ==
 
== Czechoslovakia ==
    
Since the article mentions McCain's positions on Iraq and Iran, how about mentioning his views on [[Czechoslovakia]]? He's mentioned twice in speeches in the last week concerns about events going on right now in Czechoslovakia.... (Czechoslovakia has not existed at all since 1993).
 
Since the article mentions McCain's positions on Iraq and Iran, how about mentioning his views on [[Czechoslovakia]]? He's mentioned twice in speeches in the last week concerns about events going on right now in Czechoslovakia.... (Czechoslovakia has not existed at all since 1993).
1,352

edits

Navigation menu