1,352
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: + +
Debate:Should U.S. troops be subject to Iraqi law if that allows our continued presence there? (view source)
Revision as of 14:44, July 17, 2008
, 14:44, July 17, 2008→No
::If we need to choose between keeping the newly formed Iraqi government happy and the well-being of America then, well, tough on Iraq. -- [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]]
::If we need to choose between keeping the newly formed Iraqi government happy and the well-being of America then, well, tough on Iraq. -- [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]]
:::How does our continued presence there, outside the law of the land we occupy, help the "well-being of America"? We would be occupying a sovereign nation, strike one. We would be operating outside the laws of said sovereign nation, creating antipathy amongst the population, strike two. Assuming this is a law passed by the Iraqi government, we'd be violating the laws of the nation we were supposedly invading to free them from dictatorial rule...strike three. --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 10:44, 17 July 2008 (EDT)