Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,903
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 406:
Line 406: − +
→McCarthy edits: moot
--[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 17:19, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
--[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 17:19, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
:The telegram I'm trying to retrieve right now; yes & no refers to your comment "certainly considered important at the time" which I assume refers to public perceptions based upon an uninformed media, etc., and is largely irrelevenat cause EVERYBODY was in the dark. Then we have the Rosenbergs; is this to recycle arguements that they were not guilty? Strictly speaking it don't mean diddly-squat that the docs were judged by ''ex post facto'' of little importance, his actions demonstrate he was a security risk. And the Army is not the final arbiter here anyway. This is moot. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:28, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
:The telegram I'm trying to retrieve right now; yes & no refers to your comment "certainly considered important at the time" which I assume refers to public perceptions based upon an uninformed media, etc., and is largely irrelevenat cause EVERYBODY was in the dark. Then we have the Rosenbergs; is this to recycle arguements that they were not guilty? Strictly speaking it don't mean diddly-squat that the docs were determined ''ex post facto'' of little importance, his actions demonstrate he was a security risk. And the Army is not the final arbiter here anyway. This is moot. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:28, 19 March 2007 (EDT)