3,303
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: − − ::Tempting, but I am sure we can find more sophisticated ways to mock them. Perhaps a few anti-liberal cartoons scattered around the page? - RightOfEngland Line 34:
Line 32: − − :Wrong? For one, it's tax-funding for what should be the duty of parents. It's their responsibility to raise children, not the governments. For another, public schools have turned into liberal indoctinrination centers. Just last week over here two Christian children were punished at their school for not praying to Allah (Google if you want all the details) - and the state of those in the US is no better, teaching children the values of communism, Darwinistic socialism, and hipple-style 'earth-worship' conservation. There was nothing wrong with the old system of sending them off to learn a trade. -- [[User:RightOfEngland|RightOfEngland]] Line 55:
Line 51: − + Line 85:
Line 81: − − :Isn't part of the problem that they don't hold men and women to different standards? Liberals want to load women with combat gear and send them off shoting terrorists, refusing to admit that women might be physically less able or even entertain the idea that maybe they might be targets of terrorists for psycological value, because this would be an admission that women are not just like men? -- [[User:RightOfCenter|RightOfCenter]] Line 114:
Line 108: − − ::Phelps knows how hated he is. It wouldn't surprised me if he publicly supported whoever he privately disagrees with, just because he knows that him appearing to support someone actually harms them. -- [[User:RightOfCenter|RightOfCenter]] Line 125:
Line 117: − − ::::You overlook that liberals plan to enforce the doctrine selectively, by claiming that liberal programs are really moderate. -- [[User:RightOfCenter|RightOfCenter]]
Undo revision 491397 by RightOfEngland (Talk)
I agree. Someone must put pictures of famous liberal democrats and photoshop horns onto them. That would drive the point home.
I agree. Someone must put pictures of famous liberal democrats and photoshop horns onto them. That would drive the point home.
:Much improved, thankyou. [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 20:13, 14 January 2008 (EST)
:Much improved, thankyou. [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 20:13, 14 January 2008 (EST)
And just what is so wrong about taxpayer-supported government schools? If it weren't for them, many people, including my parents, wouldn't have been able to get an education. By the way, does the stance of Aschlafly et al against this mean that they would be willing to voluntarily support the education of children not their own whose parents couldn't afford to?[[User:Alloco1|Alloco1]] 00:38, 24 October 2007 (EDT)
And just what is so wrong about taxpayer-supported government schools? If it weren't for them, many people, including my parents, wouldn't have been able to get an education. By the way, does the stance of Aschlafly et al against this mean that they would be willing to voluntarily support the education of children not their own whose parents couldn't afford to?[[User:Alloco1|Alloco1]] 00:38, 24 October 2007 (EDT)
== Pathetic Article ==
== Pathetic Article ==
*Economy/Taxation
*Economy/Taxation
*Health Care
*Health Care
*[[Law]]/Criminal Justice
*Law/Criminal Justice
*Environment
*Environment
*Education
*Education
Should we also note that liberals think women should be able to vote too, even though the conservatives throughout history have fought against women's suffrage? [[User:Alexjohnc3|Alexjohnc3]] 18:20, 15 December 2007 (EST)
Should we also note that liberals think women should be able to vote too, even though the conservatives throughout history have fought against women's suffrage? [[User:Alexjohnc3|Alexjohnc3]] 18:20, 15 December 2007 (EST)
== Subsection on liberal rankings of members of congress? ==
== Subsection on liberal rankings of members of congress? ==
I'm sorry, but this is sort of absurd. I certainly don't want WBC to be called ''conservative'', but I don't think they're liberal either. That's just kind of silly. I don't care who he supported for president. Any organization as vehemently opposed to the sin of homosexuality as they are cannot be described as "liberal", since liberals won't even admit that homosexuality is a sin in the first place! That's kind of like calling NARAL conservative simply because they are as proud of America and her military as much as conservatives are (which I'm absolutely not saying they are, but I needed something to use as an example). It's just silly. --[[User:GeneralGrievous|GeneralGrievous]] 02:21, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
I'm sorry, but this is sort of absurd. I certainly don't want WBC to be called ''conservative'', but I don't think they're liberal either. That's just kind of silly. I don't care who he supported for president. Any organization as vehemently opposed to the sin of homosexuality as they are cannot be described as "liberal", since liberals won't even admit that homosexuality is a sin in the first place! That's kind of like calling NARAL conservative simply because they are as proud of America and her military as much as conservatives are (which I'm absolutely not saying they are, but I needed something to use as an example). It's just silly. --[[User:GeneralGrievous|GeneralGrievous]] 02:21, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
:Whoops, I meant to say NARAL, not NARTH. Lol, NARTH ''is'' rather conservative. It's fixed now.
:Whoops, I meant to say NARAL, not NARTH. Lol, NARTH ''is'' rather conservative. It's fixed now.
== Huh? ==
== Huh? ==
:::A day passes. Silence. It is contradictory to claim that liberals control all media, but equal time only harms conservatives. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 15:48, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:::A day passes. Silence. It is contradictory to claim that liberals control all media, but equal time only harms conservatives. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 15:48, 27 January 2008 (EST)
== Liberal ==
== Liberal ==