4,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 35:
Line 35: + +
→San Francisco Values?: reply
Pelosi and fellow liberals have been termed "San Francisco liberals" or been deemed to have "San Francisco values" for quite some time, likely predating the CP article of the same name. It's been used throughout the 1990's by conservatives, and been expanded upon by Newt Gingrich and Bill O'Reilly for example. While I don't doubt that great work has been put into the entry here on CP, I wonder if it's "expanded upon" the term enough to give it the claim of a CP term. Thoughts?--[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 10:35, 20 July 2008 (EDT)
Pelosi and fellow liberals have been termed "San Francisco liberals" or been deemed to have "San Francisco values" for quite some time, likely predating the CP article of the same name. It's been used throughout the 1990's by conservatives, and been expanded upon by Newt Gingrich and Bill O'Reilly for example. While I don't doubt that great work has been put into the entry here on CP, I wonder if it's "expanded upon" the term enough to give it the claim of a CP term. Thoughts?--[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 10:35, 20 July 2008 (EDT)
:I admit the article is young, but hopefully it will be expanded soon to have genuine ideas unique to CP. I have some thoughts germinating for future edits, but as of now there's only been a sole contributor to the article, which is not the case with most of the other pages in the list. In any case, I think the link should stay so that the page is not forgotten, since it falls in line with the other pages in the list. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 17:25, 20 July 2008 (EDT)