112
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 27:
Line 27: +
Debate:Is Conservapedia blinkered? (view source)
Revision as of 22:05, July 21, 2008
, 22:05, July 21, 2008→NO!: response
:I have every right to criticize Conservapedia. It's a free country. --[[User:Harebrained|Harebrained]] 06:37, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
:I have every right to criticize Conservapedia. It's a free country. --[[User:Harebrained|Harebrained]] 06:37, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
::Conservapedia, from my standpoint, was created with the intention of educating and informing people about history, politics, science, religion, etc. from a conservative standpoint. Now, placing articles like those in an encyclopedia hardly works to the benefit of conservative values. It is far more productive to use your resources for writing a quality encyclopedia that everyone of every age can read than to express interest in oversexualized knowledge that will cause debate and concern for individuals across the political/social spectrum. In an Internet culture that is oversaturated with sex and violence, Conservapedia should be considered a safe haven for moral and well-reasoned information.--[[User:CTrooper|CTrooper]] 18:05, 21 July 2008 (EDT)