245
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 45:
Line 45: +
→A joke: agree
::::Every schoolkid knows how to use Google. [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=sex&btnG=Google+Search Googling for "sex"] yields Wikipedia's "sexual intercourse" article in the second position, and experience tells me it will soon be in the first. That article, BTW, tells those aforementioned kids interesting things about anal sex among other things, and has a long list of links to articles about every possible form of human sexual behavior, including many that your clientele may not consider overly familiy friendly. And you don't want a sex article in your family friendly encyclopedia? Bwahaha. Bwahahahahaaaaaa!
::::Every schoolkid knows how to use Google. [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=sex&btnG=Google+Search Googling for "sex"] yields Wikipedia's "sexual intercourse" article in the second position, and experience tells me it will soon be in the first. That article, BTW, tells those aforementioned kids interesting things about anal sex among other things, and has a long list of links to articles about every possible form of human sexual behavior, including many that your clientele may not consider overly familiy friendly. And you don't want a sex article in your family friendly encyclopedia? Bwahaha. Bwahahahahaaaaaa!
::::: So, looks like it's official policy then? Sex doesn't exist. I'm sure that will stop kids looking elsewhere. --[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 17:40, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
::::: So, looks like it's official policy then? Sex doesn't exist. I'm sure that will stop kids looking elsewhere. --[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 17:40, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
::::::I came here to learn what "conservatives" think, as they claimed it can't be put in Wikipedia. So far, I'm still confused - sex is taboo, but [[marriage]] includes a wide range of styles with multiple partners, and [[homosexuality]] can be discussed too. I cannot understand a "conservative" position that allows discussion of multiple partners of both sexes, but can't stomach an article about monogamous sex with a spouse. I haven't contributed much, because I just can't get my head around what might be acceptable. The [[divorce]] article is unlikely to help anyone who is going through it, or who's parents or friend's parents are, either! --[[User:Scott|Scott]] 18:00, 19 March 2007 (EDT)