Block
1,976
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 621:
Line 621: + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 04:10, July 22, 2008
, 04:10, July 22, 2008→Username "ChristianityMeansFreedom" judged to be "profane, disruptive, or otherwise inappropriate": new section
Check it out [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quote_mining here]. Also see the discussion page [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Quote_mining here]. Lots of claims of this supposedly being a "well-documented" practice among Creationists, but little if any evidence of that is provided. Try to edit the article to reflect this fact and the evolutionist cabal is quick to revert it under false pretenses. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 15:54, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
Check it out [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quote_mining here]. Also see the discussion page [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Quote_mining here]. Lots of claims of this supposedly being a "well-documented" practice among Creationists, but little if any evidence of that is provided. Try to edit the article to reflect this fact and the evolutionist cabal is quick to revert it under false pretenses. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 15:54, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
== Username "ChristianityMeansFreedom" judged to be "profane, disruptive, or otherwise inappropriate" ==
Holy cow! I wouldn't have believed it without seeing it for my own eyes.
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ChristianityMeansFreedom Block message on user page]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=223450235#Disruptive_editor_User:ChristianityMeansFreedom Admin noticeboard history]
The guy's edits weren't even that horrible. Certainly not vandalism. They might have taken some time to discuss the edits with the user, but they judged the user name to be offensive. Right. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 00:10, 22 July 2008 (EDT)