9
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + + + + + + + + +
→Hippocratic Oath: new section
LOL @ ''18:44, 16 July 2008 HenryS (Talk | contribs | block) unblocked AKjeldsen (Talk | contribs) (User is begging and whining to be unblocked. )'' --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:18, 16 July 2008 (EDT)
LOL @ ''18:44, 16 July 2008 HenryS (Talk | contribs | block) unblocked AKjeldsen (Talk | contribs) (User is begging and whining to be unblocked. )'' --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:18, 16 July 2008 (EDT)
== [[Hippocratic Oath]] ==
Henry, Why did you revert my edit to [[Oath of Hippocrates]]?
# The entire section is about people who are ''critical'' of the oath. It makes sense to call the section "Criticism" instead of the watered down "Views".
# "'''Some''' Christian doctors '''may not like''' this oath" — That's just deliberately weak liberal claptrap. Do you really believe that a ''devout'' Christian can "solemnly swear to Apollo and Asclepius" — [[pagan]] Roman Gods?! What happened to "Thou shalt have no other Gods before Me?" My edit just removed the liberal, cultural-relativist POV from that sentence. Look at the history, where [[Deborah]] has been watering it down and watering it down ever since the article was created.
# Other than that, I just made some links to other articles — which you also reverted.
Can I have your permission to edit the article again for these reasons?
[[User:GeorgeM|GeorgeM]] 11:45, 22 July 2008 (EDT)