Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 29: Line 29:     
::: But the idea for the conference is "federally funded junk science" not "restrictions on liberty".  If the science itself isn't being questioned, but rather the rights of the people, is it necessarily a good fit for this conference? --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 12:16, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
 
::: But the idea for the conference is "federally funded junk science" not "restrictions on liberty".  If the science itself isn't being questioned, but rather the rights of the people, is it necessarily a good fit for this conference? --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 12:16, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::I'm with Jareddr on this one - unless the topic is a presentation on how the science that shows smoking (or second-hand smoke) to be harmful should be considered "federally-funded junk science", then it doesn't belong in this particular conference by definition.  I'll start up a debate page on smoking restrictions here on CP, though. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 12:58, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
1,516

edits

Navigation menu