1,516
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: − +
Corrected link to point to this page.
''Text:''
''Text:''
: Flaws in this PNAS paper negate its claim that ''E. Coli'' bacteria underwent an evolutionary beneficial mutation. See http://www.conservapedia.com/Flaws_in_Richard_Lenski_Study and its talk page. The flaws include:
: Flaws in this PNAS paper negate its claim that ''E. Coli'' bacteria underwent an evolutionary beneficial mutation. See http://www.conservapedia.com/Letter_to_PNAS . The flaws include:
:: 1. Figure 3 depicts an "historical contingency" hypothesis around the 31,000th generation, but the abstract states that mutations "arose by 20,000 generations." The paper fails to admit that the Third Experiment disproved this.
:: 1. Figure 3 depicts an "historical contingency" hypothesis around the 31,000th generation, but the abstract states that mutations "arose by 20,000 generations." The paper fails to admit that the Third Experiment disproved this.