Changes

''Text:''

''Text:''

: Flaws in this PNAS paper negate its claim that ''E. Coli'' bacteria underwent an evolutionary beneficial mutation, as discussed at http://www.conservapedia.com/Flaws_in_Richard_Lenski_Study and its talk page. The flaws include:

: The following flaws in this PNAS paper negate its claim that ''E. Coli'' bacteria underwent an evolutionary beneficial mutation:<ref>This is discussed at length at http://www.conservapedia.com/Flaws_in_Richard_Lenski_Study and its talk page.</ref>

:: 1. Figure 3 depicts an "historical contingency" hypothesis around the 31,000th generation, but the abstract states that mutations "arose by 20,000 generations."  The paper fails to admit that the Third Experiment disproved the hypothesis depicted in Figure 3.

:: 1. Figure 3 depicts an "historical contingency" hypothesis around the 31,000th generation, but the abstract states that mutations "arose by 20,000 generations."  The paper fails to admit that the Third Experiment disproved the hypothesis depicted in Figure 3.