24
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Nice article.: new section
==Deceit of Evolutionists and the Public==
==Deceit of Evolutionists and the Public==
This section appears to be misnamed, since it is simply a statement of de
This section appears to be misnamed, since it is simply a statement of de
== Nice article. ==
Everytime I look at this article, I want to laugh, and moreso, vomit. It seems as if the trustworthy encyclopedia has become untrustworthy with all the hate it uses when it comes to varying subjects. This is something that wikipedia tries not to do. It supports both sides of a subject with real sources and facts. Probably I should convert to the "liberal god-hating" encyclopedia, but before I do, I wish to leave my mark on this extremely biased article.
This article states everything that can possibly go wrong with atheism. Well, why not we try to turn this boat and list some good things about atheism as well?
How about the fact that atheists on average have a higher IQ score than beleivers, statistically speaking?
How about the fact that atheists tend to be less rascist than non-beleivers?
How about the fact that atheists are less likely to perform acts of abuse and crimes than theists?
How about the fact that atheists are victimized by theists more than theists by non-theists?
How about the fact that atheists are more likely to promote civil rights than theists?
This article has gotten way out of hand, and in a sense, has become a trashbag for people that are pissed off about the existance of atheism, and have come to this page simply to rant like madmen about how athiesm is going to somehow "doom" the earth. I would rather beleive the uncyclopedia article on athiesm rather than this posh. No wonder the rest of the world, including wikipedia pokes fun at your slanderous "encyclopedia".