1,516
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 148:
Line 148: + +
→Availability of data
: I thought about this, but PNAS can simply omit the sentence at the end upon publication. It seems unnecessary and inappropriate to break this letter into two separate ones just for one sentence.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:26, 27 July 2008 (EDT)
: I thought about this, but PNAS can simply omit the sentence at the end upon publication. It seems unnecessary and inappropriate to break this letter into two separate ones just for one sentence.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:26, 27 July 2008 (EDT)
::It seems more inappropriate to knowingly submit something to PNAS that is against their guidelines and then expecting them to edit the unacceptable comment out on their end. I'd suggest that the "PNAS Letters" submission will be taken more credibly if we respect their guidelines, and instead send the version with the "withholding data" accusation to the appropriate parties separately, and copy PNAS as a courtesy. My grandfather told me I'd never regret taking the high road, and 40-plus years later his advice has served me well. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 10:08, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
==My sixpenn'orth==
==My sixpenn'orth==