37
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: +
Talk:His Dark Materials (novel) (view source)
Revision as of 03:03, July 30, 2008
, 03:03, July 30, 2008→"Interesting to note"
:We are allowed to point out odd choices that would be of interest to conservative thought. That such a thing is even possible would be of interest to our demographics. To not put it in would be more of an oversite than its inclusion. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 22:42, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
:We are allowed to point out odd choices that would be of interest to conservative thought. That such a thing is even possible would be of interest to our demographics. To not put it in would be more of an oversite than its inclusion. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 22:42, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
::So personal insight (in the form of editorial commentary like "odd choice") in articles is a special feature of Conservapedia? Well, I suppose that's the choice of the people who run the site, but I hope you'll agree that it creates an uncomfortable grey area for an encyclopedia. [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 22:58, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
::So personal insight (in the form of editorial commentary like "odd choice") in articles is a special feature of Conservapedia? Well, I suppose that's the choice of the people who run the site, but I hope you'll agree that it creates an uncomfortable grey area for an encyclopedia. [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 22:58, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
:::I fear I may have started this thing by removing a sentence that was much worse than that Wandering is now complaining of. Perhaps if Learn Together explained exactly what the resemblance between this award and Al Gore's award we might be in a better position to evaluate the situation.--[[User:MCrowe|MCrowe]] 23:03, 29 July 2008 (EDT)