Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 153: Line 153:  
I was trying to be respectful and solicit feedback before the pruning, and I chose that term for a reason.  I wasn't looking to wipe the entire page, and left uncited points which were not as clearly out of place as the ones I was removing.  I also gave a brief explanation for why I believed each trimmed point should be removed.  What I'd ask is that before any are put back, they are cited, or the reason why they don't need to be cited briefly explained.   
 
I was trying to be respectful and solicit feedback before the pruning, and I chose that term for a reason.  I wasn't looking to wipe the entire page, and left uncited points which were not as clearly out of place as the ones I was removing.  I also gave a brief explanation for why I believed each trimmed point should be removed.  What I'd ask is that before any are put back, they are cited, or the reason why they don't need to be cited briefly explained.   
   −
I know people get sensitive when any edits are made to a ''"Liberal ----"'' article, so when I contemplate changes I keep it fair, and think about how people would want a corresponding '"Conservative ----"'' article to read.  With that in mind, please apply the same consideration to the quality and validation of additions here. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 17:56, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
+
I know people get sensitive when any edits are made to a ''"Liberal ----"'' article, so when I contemplate changes I keep it fair, and think about how people would want a corresponding ''"Conservative ----"'' article to read.  With that in mind, please apply the same consideration to the quality and validation of additions here. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 17:56, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
1,516

edits

Navigation menu