Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Liberal myths (view source)

Revision as of 21:52, August 1, 2008

659 bytes added ,  21:52, August 1, 2008
reply
Line 179: Line 179:     
I could go on, but since I've been told these need to stay, any added examples are a waste of time.  Good luck with the article, and thanks for trying at least. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 13:22, 1 August 2008 (EDT)
 
I could go on, but since I've been told these need to stay, any added examples are a waste of time.  Good luck with the article, and thanks for trying at least. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 13:22, 1 August 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
: No, that's not what you were told.  I asked you to make an effort to look for citations, some of which are easy-to-find, rather than simply deleting (censoring) something you disagreed with.  Many of the myths are obvious and cannot seriously be denied to be liberal myths.  This is not Wikipedia where liberal editors run around quickly deleting truths they don't like by claiming they are unsupported.
 +
 +
: Deborah's analysis about feminists above is superb, and I can add that women in the United States live on average far longer than men, which is hardly a sign of suppression and victimization.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:52, 1 August 2008 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,214

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/494731"

Navigation menu