Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  16:37, August 4, 2008
m
Line 188: Line 188:     
==Is this correct?==
 
==Is this correct?==
''"The following flaws in this PNAS paper negate its claim that E. Coli bacteria evolved through a beneficial mutation"'' Flaws in an argument would tend to put the conclusion in doubt rather than show it to be false.  Is the assertion that Lanski has not proved his point or that the data and methodology prove his point is false?  This sentence reads to me to be asserting the latter. --[[User:Toffeeman|Toffeeman]] 12:36, 4 August 2008 (EDT)
+
''"The following flaws in this PNAS paper negate its claim that E. Coli bacteria evolved through a beneficial mutation"'' Flaws in an argument would tend to put the conclusion in doubt rather than show it to be false.  Is the assertion that Lenski has not proved his point or that the data and methodology prove his point is false?  This sentence reads to me to be asserting the latter. --[[User:Toffeeman|Toffeeman]] 12:36, 4 August 2008 (EDT)
    
==How about this  
 
==How about this  
241

edits

Navigation menu