Changes

::Further, I would direct you to the revert war going over on [[Physics]]: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Physics&action=history].  The subject of the reverts is whether or not to call the universe "God's Universe" or not.  The commandment "give full credit to Christianity" is unclear and the user in favor of "God's universe" seemed to receive confirmation from Aschlafly that this would be appropriate.  So ''that'' is the primary reason given for "God's" inclusion with the article.  That is not indicative of constitutional republic or a rules based democracy, it is indicative of monarchy. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 12:17, 19 March 2007 (EDT)  

::Further, I would direct you to the revert war going over on [[Physics]]: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Physics&action=history].  The subject of the reverts is whether or not to call the universe "God's Universe" or not.  The commandment "give full credit to Christianity" is unclear and the user in favor of "God's universe" seemed to receive confirmation from Aschlafly that this would be appropriate.  So ''that'' is the primary reason given for "God's" inclusion with the article.  That is not indicative of constitutional republic or a rules based democracy, it is indicative of monarchy. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 12:17, 19 March 2007 (EDT)  

'''''I was trying to find the reverts - or are they gone permanently since someone decided that it was inappropriate/wrong/whatever?'''''[[User:kchittur|kchittur]] 2:50, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

''''I was trying to find the reverts - or are they gone permanently since someone decided that it was inappropriate/wrong/whatever?''''[[User:kchittur|kchittur]] 2:50, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

::Check the history, maybe I linked it incorrectly.  The gist of the revert war is whether or not physics should be described as "the study of nature, and is the science of studying the laws of the universe" or "the study of nature, and is the science of studying the laws of God's universe."

::Check the history, maybe I linked it incorrectly.  The gist of the revert war is whether or not physics should be described as "the study of nature, and is the science of studying the laws of the universe" or "the study of nature, and is the science of studying the laws of God's universe." ''(OK, I'll try and navigate the reverts)''

This kind of discussion is exactly what I'm hoping for.  Thanks especially to Mr. Schlafly for contributing.  If, as you say, Wikipedia is more like a constitutional/representative democracy, then, to carry the analogy further, there should be a limited set of elected or appointed contributors who are trained to follow the commandments and who are true experts in their fields.  The "people" would be the subscribers to the site.  This still would not be a true Wiki.  I am not arguing against your goals--that is your business.  I am simply saying that the chosen format does not seem consistent with your goals.  For instance, this discussion...

This kind of discussion is exactly what I'm hoping for.  Thanks especially to Mr. Schlafly for contributing.  If, as you say, Wikipedia is more like a constitutional/representative democracy, then, to carry the analogy further, there should be a limited set of elected or appointed contributors who are trained to follow the commandments and who are true experts in their fields.  The "people" would be the subscribers to the site.  This still would not be a true Wiki.  I am not arguing against your goals--that is your business.  I am simply saying that the chosen format does not seem consistent with your goals.  For instance, this discussion...