Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 99:
Line 99: + +
Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math (view source)
Revision as of 22:34, August 9, 2008
, 22:34, August 9, 2008→Draft Curriculum: final reply
:::::::::::: Are you thinking of [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/IntuitionisticLogic.html Intuitionistic Logic]? [[User:AdrianDelmar|AdrianDelmar]] 18:29, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
:::::::::::: Are you thinking of [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/IntuitionisticLogic.html Intuitionistic Logic]? [[User:AdrianDelmar|AdrianDelmar]] 18:29, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
::::::::::::: You're not addressing my basic point, which I've repeated twice now, so I probably won't pursue this discussion further at this time. Godspeed to you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:34, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
*You say: "No tools beyond about 9th grade math are required, and motivated students younger than 9th grade will not have difficulty with the concepts." I think 9th-graders will struggle with Goldbach, Wiles, Hilbert... [[User:Googly|Googly]] 21:09, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
*You say: "No tools beyond about 9th grade math are required, and motivated students younger than 9th grade will not have difficulty with the concepts." I think 9th-graders will struggle with Goldbach, Wiles, Hilbert... [[User:Googly|Googly]] 21:09, 6 August 2008 (EDT)