Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 102: Line 102:     
::: Teaching liberal beliefs would qualify as a "psychological" and/or "environmental" factor that could cause mental illness.  That you dismiss this possible cause out of hand, and even attempt to censor it, illustrates the illogical, self-contradictory approach taken by liberals.  Yes, imposing contradictions and falsehoods on others could be bad for their mental health.  Surely you don't doubt that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:01, 11 August 2008 (EDT)
 
::: Teaching liberal beliefs would qualify as a "psychological" and/or "environmental" factor that could cause mental illness.  That you dismiss this possible cause out of hand, and even attempt to censor it, illustrates the illogical, self-contradictory approach taken by liberals.  Yes, imposing contradictions and falsehoods on others could be bad for their mental health.  Surely you don't doubt that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:01, 11 August 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Causation fail ==
 +
 +
Aschlafly,
 +
 +
I discovered Conservapedia recently, and this "essay" is my first exposure to the philosophy of the site.  Needless to say, I'm not impressed.  Quite apart from ideology, your statement, "Medical professionals emphasize that they do not know what causes mental illness.[6] Accordingly, they cannot rule out that liberal indoctrination is a contributing factor," is massively flawed.
 +
 +
That one cannot rule out something as a contributing factor is not sufficient evidence for causality; it's even weaker and more flawed than arguing that correlation equals causation.  I'm holding a fountain pen right now.  There are no tigers nearby.  You can't rule out the possibility that the fountain pen keeps the tigers away.  Would you like my Fountain Pen of Tiger Ward?  Yours for $1,000.
 +
 +
My point is that, by your argument, anything at all could be the "cause" of mental illness.  If you're going to argue that liberalism causes it, from such scant evidence, it's clear that you're more after an agenda than the truth, and that should be made clear, or better evidence of causation should be found.
 +
 +
I see you're a lawyer of some kind.  I expect better of legal professionals than to find causation in the most tenuous of links... unless they're being paid to do that, of course :).  In which case, I still wouldn't be happy if this was the best you could do for money.-[[User:Gcarhart|Gcarhart]] 09:12, 11 August 2008 (EDT)
4

edits

Navigation menu