Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 32: Line 32:     
: Could be that the warning signs were erroneously rejected without word getting to [[FDR]], but that seems a bit cavalier in dealing with an attack, doesn't it?  Many doubt U.S. intelligence was really that weak.  After all, the U.S. had clearly broken the Japanese code prior to the attack.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 07:35, 13 August 2008 (EDT)r
 
: Could be that the warning signs were erroneously rejected without word getting to [[FDR]], but that seems a bit cavalier in dealing with an attack, doesn't it?  Many doubt U.S. intelligence was really that weak.  After all, the U.S. had clearly broken the Japanese code prior to the attack.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 07:35, 13 August 2008 (EDT)r
 +
 +
::It's possible - WW2 is littered with examples of good intelligence being ignored to the detriment of either side. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sub>[[User talk:JessicaT|''Ohayo gozaimasu!'']]</sub> 09:09, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
4,336

edits

Navigation menu