Changes

:::I must confess I am in conflict with my church's position on this one.  I think censorship should be applied similar to the way we apply hatespeech.  A book shouldnt be censored for merely mentioning or describing immoral or ungodly things.  Rather it should be banned for inciting people to do such things.  Thus Harry Potter shouldn't be banned but a book on "how to cast spells" should be.[[user:DamianJohn]]

:::I must confess I am in conflict with my church's position on this one.  I think censorship should be applied similar to the way we apply hatespeech.  A book shouldnt be censored for merely mentioning or describing immoral or ungodly things.  Rather it should be banned for inciting people to do such things.  Thus Harry Potter shouldn't be banned but a book on "how to cast spells" should be.[[user:DamianJohn]]

==No, no, no, no...no.==

==No, no, no, no...no.==

Tell me, what does censorship accomplish? It takes away someone's access to information. Now that is done, all that is left is one side. One sided information creates drones. People who are the same. Now, if everyone were the same, we couldn't really have progress. Here are some examples of people who have been labeled different, people with new ideas, that were considered bad. MLK, Galileo Galilei, and Jesus.

Tell me, what does censorship accomplish? It takes away someone's access to information. Now that is done, all that is left is one side. One sided information creates drones. People who are the same. Now, if everyone were the same, we couldn't really have progress. Here are some examples of people who have been labeled different, people with new ideas, that were considered bad. MLK, Galileo Galilei, and Jesus. -[[User:Nono|Nono]] 16:21, 17 August 2008 (EDT)

[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]

[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]