Changes
:::Huh? Real numbers are those people concretely use. You can express any amount of dollars with real numbers. What would 3 + 2i dollars mean? Or the length of a segment or a curve: it is "real" and expressed in real numbers. Imaginary numbers are just ''imaginary'' constructions to help our calculations. They don't refer to "real" concepts people use. Thus, the historical meaning of real vs. imaginary is still valid for normal people - and homeschooled students who use Conservapedia to learn. I absolutely agree with RSchlafly. [[User:SilvioB|SilvioB]] 16:53, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
::::Actually, you can express any amount of currency with rational numbers. That doesn't make the real numbers any less "real," does it? Using your logic, I could say "Pi is a real number. What does pi dollars mean? Nothing. Therefore, the real numbers don't exist." Again, imaginary numbers are ''not'' "just imaginary." They exist just as much as any other number, and have several practical applications.--[[User_talk:Recorder|Recorder]] 17:21, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
::::ActuallyFor currency, you can express any amount use a subset of currency with the rational numbers, i. That doesn't make the real numbers any e., finite decimal fractions (even less "real," does it? Using your logic, I could say "Pi is a real numbergenerally: <math>\mathbb{Z} / 100</math>. What does To speak of <math>\pi </math> dollars (or even $<math>\sqrt{2}</math>) is as surreal as to speak of ''3 + 2i'' dollars mean? Nothing. Therefore, the real ''Real numbers don'' which aren't exist." Againrational, imaginary numbers are just a figment of our imagination, invented to ''nothelp our calculations'' "just imaginary." They exist just as much as any other number, and have several practical applications.too--[[User_talkUser:RecorderDiEb|RecorderDiEb]] 17:2125, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
