nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: +
Talk:Skeptics Annotated Bible (view source)
Revision as of 14:24, August 19, 2008
, 14:24, August 19, 2008Example provided as requested
The refutation also makes no direct material claims that can be or are sourced...Would it be possible to show a refuted example? --[[User:Ctv|Ctv]] 20:40, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
The refutation also makes no direct material claims that can be or are sourced...Would it be possible to show a refuted example? --[[User:Ctv|Ctv]] 20:40, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
: I've added one for your edification. And by the way, I came up with this one by thinking of what I consider to be one of the all-time silliest criticisms of the Bible, and started editing this article accordingly, convinced that the SAB would be silly enough to repeat it. Sure enough, they do. Tektonic's description of the SAB is spot on. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:24, 19 August 2008 (EDT)