65
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + +
Talk:Debate: should atheists be barred from Conservapedia? (view source)
Revision as of 23:23, August 19, 2008
, 23:23, August 19, 2008→Clearly a Parodist: new section
:I made my comment here because it is indeed sarcasm, and I wanted to keep it off of the debate itself so it doesn't devolve into people taking shots at each other. (Note that Aschlafly has endorsed the use of sarcasm when appropriate, but it needs to be expressed in the proper place). Frankly, Bugler's proposal is so ridiculous that addressing it seriously is to give it credibility, which I will not do. As for the mental illness reference, you must have missed reading [[Talk:Mystery:Do Liberal Teachings Cause Mental Illness?]] --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 10:25, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
:I made my comment here because it is indeed sarcasm, and I wanted to keep it off of the debate itself so it doesn't devolve into people taking shots at each other. (Note that Aschlafly has endorsed the use of sarcasm when appropriate, but it needs to be expressed in the proper place). Frankly, Bugler's proposal is so ridiculous that addressing it seriously is to give it credibility, which I will not do. As for the mental illness reference, you must have missed reading [[Talk:Mystery:Do Liberal Teachings Cause Mental Illness?]] --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 10:25, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
== Clearly a Parodist ==
I'm sorry, I don't want to make random accusations, but I've seen some of Bugler's edits lately, and I for one am convinced that this is the work of a parodist. If I'm wrong, then I apologize, and I understand criticism of atheists and liberals, Bugler takes this to the point that I cannot believe he is genuine. [[User:MikeR|MikeR]] 19:23, 19 August 2008 (EDT)