Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 22: Line 22:  
Now try an example that isn't trivial.  Let
 
Now try an example that isn't trivial.  Let
 
:<math>f(x) = x^x\,</math>
 
:<math>f(x) = x^x\,</math>
−
This function is well-defined for x>0, using the general definition that involves the [[exponential]] and [[natural logarithm]] functions.  But we can calculate f(x) for other values:
+
This function is well-defined for x>0, using the general definition that involves the [[exponential]] and [[natural logarithm]] functions.  We can calculate f(x) for various values of x:
 
  f(5) = 3125
 
  f(5) = 3125
 
  f(2) = 4
 
  f(2) = 4
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266

edits

Navigation menu