343
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 153:
Line 153: + +
→The use of the Time Magazine reference: because I was asked, then yes. What I Want.
:: Would you prefer specific phrases from the article such as "In various cases judges have labeled the church 'schizophrenic and paranoid' and 'corrupt, sinister and dangerous.'" ? [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 23:00, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
:: Would you prefer specific phrases from the article such as "In various cases judges have labeled the church 'schizophrenic and paranoid' and 'corrupt, sinister and dangerous.'" ? [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 23:00, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
::: I have tried to communicate and have said, "I prefer articles that present good information to a reader". If that means a page number in a reference's link, or a paragraph number, or a dozen references, then good. I want good information, cleanly presented, so a reader can understand the subject without muddling through 1000s of pages of opinion, disparaging remarks, baised statement and psychobabble. "The sky is blue", "the moon is made of green cheese", "apples are red". Good clean easy to understand information without the reader having to read between the lines, without the reader necessarily having to hold a sarcastic attitude to "get it". Clean, easy to read, uptone, light mannered. That's what I want, whatever that takes. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 23:17, 19 March 2007 (EDT)