Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 171: Line 171:     
::::: There may well be other factors causing mental illness, but it's sheer folly to deny that teachings are a factor.  Once you accept that, it's silly to think that all ideological teachings have the same effects, and there is no reason to think they would all be equal in influence on mental health.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:35, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
 
::::: There may well be other factors causing mental illness, but it's sheer folly to deny that teachings are a factor.  Once you accept that, it's silly to think that all ideological teachings have the same effects, and there is no reason to think they would all be equal in influence on mental health.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:35, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::::In Pyschology today we use what is known as the BioPsychoSocial approach.  In essence, it means that when diagnosing a problem, the Pyschologist should take into account their Biographical information (Genetic History, brain function and such) They're Psychological information (thinking abilities, emotions, and motivations) and the Social information (Family, Ethnicity, Social Class).  What you have done is completely ignore two of the three to focus solely on the so called Liberal teachings.  If your argument is true, why in mental illness still relatively rare.  Millions of people in the united states and the world have come from these dangerous liberal schools, yet merely a few hundred thousand are diagnosed with serious mental illness.  You seem to be working backwards from your conclusion to find links. [[User:JamalG|Jamal Greene]] 11:04, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
24

edits

Navigation menu