Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 105: Line 105:     
Something I also want to point out is that the current "relevance" should have nothing to do with it. Look at it this way, if someone in the year 2010 wants to do research on the 2008 Presidential race, they might want to know what the polls said in July. This shouldn't be like a blog with only the latest information. [[User:Chippeterson|Chippeterson]] 18 August 2008
 
Something I also want to point out is that the current "relevance" should have nothing to do with it. Look at it this way, if someone in the year 2010 wants to do research on the 2008 Presidential race, they might want to know what the polls said in July. This shouldn't be like a blog with only the latest information. [[User:Chippeterson|Chippeterson]] 18 August 2008
 +
 +
== Edwards and Jackson v. Republicans ==
 +
 +
LT, I think the information should be considered separately on who is NOT attending the convention.  Edwards and Jackson are not attending, I suppose, due to pressure from the DNC.  The Republicans are not attending the convention by their own choosing so as to minimize the links drawn between the GOP and the individual politicians in a tough political environment.  So, first off, I don't think it's necessarily a "If you don't do it for them, then you shouldn't for the others" type of situation.  Frankly, this site is FAR from an equal treatment of one party and the other.  But, if necessary, I think BOTH should be included, as opposed to neither.  Obviously the GOP side has already been written, and you've modified it to, IMO, water it down slightly, but in any case, it seems to have been agreed upon.  I think the Dem side should be added, perhaps here in the talk page first, modified appropriately, and then inserted into the article as well.  I'd rather have more information than less.  --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 11:57, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
1,352

edits

Navigation menu