201
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 22:
Line 22: + +
Talk:Stephanie Tubbs Jones (view source)
Revision as of 23:01, August 21, 2008
, 23:01, August 21, 2008Commented.
I didn't think most mainstream conservatives would have a problem with "Emergency contraception for rape victims at all hospitals. " Preventing a pregnancy by a rapist is not the same as aborting one. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 14:23, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
I didn't think most mainstream conservatives would have a problem with "Emergency contraception for rape victims at all hospitals. " Preventing a pregnancy by a rapist is not the same as aborting one. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 14:23, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
:Common mistake, but in this case it is. 'Emergency contraception' is a deliberatly misleading name, a propaganda term created by liberals to hide the true nature of the pill in question: It prevents implantation. That is, it allows a human being to starve to death, and that makes it clearly wrong. While I am sure we all feel for the rape victims, two rights do not make a wrong - once egg meets sperm, we cannot kill the result. They will just have to carry the baby all the way to term. They can keep it or put it up for adoption after that, their choice. [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]] 19:01, 21 August 2008 (EDT)